Hiya Mike
@EpicNPC, mods, and fellow sellers,
I’m one of the smaller sellers who are affected by the rule. After reading through the forum discussions, I wanted to share my two cents on this topic. I’ll do my best to remain as unbiased as possible.
From what I’ve seen, I genuinely believe that Mike wants to create the best experience for buyers. At the same time, I agree with many of the points raised by different mods/sellers, especially
@Taki. This discussion seems to have turned into a
"you say, I say, you think, I think" kind of debate, so I encourage everyone to take a step back and consider all perspectives.
TL;DR of the issue:
The core issue revolves around EpicNPC’s new rule banning catalog links, which sellers and moderators argue will negatively impact business and create a monopoly for larger sellers.
Admin’s Perspective (Mike's) – @EpicNPC (correct me if anything is off)
- Catalog links function similarly to affiliate/referral links, which the platform has historically banned.
- Too many sellers are using the same catalogs, leading to repetitive listings and a poor buyer experience.
- Some sellers avoid detection by directing buyers to external platforms (e.g., Discord) to share catalogs.
- The goal is for sellers to either maintain their own inventory or have unique catalog pages per reseller.
Sellers’ Perspective (Based on discussions from mods/sellers, which I fully agree with)
- Catalogs are not affiliate/referral links since resellers complete the transactions themselves.
- Forcing sellers to maintain their own stock is impractical and inefficient, given the large volume of available accounts.
- The proposed solutions (requiring sellers to maintain individual catalogs) don’t actually solve the issue—the same accounts will still be listed.
- Banning catalog links creates an unfair monopoly for larger sellers who can afford paid advertising, potentially allowing them to charge even higher margins, which could exploit newer buyers.
Buyers’ Perspective (I’m not a buyer, but from experience, here’s what they say about catalog)
*
FOR Catalog Links:
- Buyers want a convenient way to browse available accounts.
- A complete ban makes it harder for them to efficiently find what they want.
AGAINST Catalog Links:
- Catalog not having pricing makes it less convenient for buyers to shop
- The same account from the same catalog having different prices means they have to ask a few before deciding to purchase an account (IMPORTANT: If smaller sellers are blocked from catalogs, big sellers with sticky threads will dominate, driving up prices and reducing competition.)
I’ve
never heard buyers complain that “too many sellers listing the same catalog creates redundancy and confusion.” If anyone has encountered this, please share your experience. Instead of banning catalogs, wouldn’t it be better to improve how they work?
Proposed Middle-Ground Solutions
1. Ban Catalog Links on EpicNPC, But Allow External Communication
Currently, Rule #3 states:
"Redirecting users to other chats (Discord, Telegram, etc.) for the purpose of promoting these types of links is also prohibited."
I believe a
better middle-ground solution is to remove this restriction while keeping the rest intact. This would:
- Prevent spam on EpicNPC caused by excessive catalog links.
- Still allow buyers to choose whether they want to use a catalog, as many actually prefer it for its ease of use (filtering by character, server, etc.).
- Be fairer for all sellers instead of only benefiting those who can afford paid ads.
also am thinking why not
run a poll to let buyers vote on whether they want this change? That way, we can get data-driven feedback instead of just debating opinions.
2. Require Transparent Disclosure from Resellers
I’m very transparent about being a reseller, and
many of my customers are completely fine with it.
- Holding stock increases risk, which leads to higher markups.
- Most customers would rather have a reseller “drop-ship” an account if it means a better deal.
- From a buyer’s POV, as long as they get the account as advertised, they’re happy.
If transparency is the concern, why not require sellers to clearly disclose whether they are resellers or direct sellers? (I believe this feature already exists, but perhaps it could be made more prominent.) That would
solve the problem without banning catalogs altogether.
3. Differentiate Paid Ads from General Listings
- Paid ads should still be allowed to feature direct links since they support the platform financially.
- However, regular sellers should not be penalized if a customer specifically asks for a catalog account.
Use Cases Where Catalogs Are Helpful:
- Price Comparison – A buyer wants the same account from the same catalog but at a better price.
- First-Time Buyers – A buyer is new and wants the easiest way to browse accounts.
I’m
not a huge fan of paid ads getting special treatment, but I get that they help keep the platform running. That said,
regular sellers shouldn’t be punished simply because buyers prefer a catalog format.
Final Thoughts
The
outright ban on catalog links is bit
too extreme, as it heavily favors large sellers while harming both smaller sellers and buyers. The
real problem is spam, and that can be fixed
without killing off catalogs entirely.
A better approach imo would be to:
* Ban catalog spam
on EpicNPC, but allow external communication.
* Require
transparency from resellers instead of banning catalogs.
* Differentiate
paid ads from general listings fairly.
Would love to hear thoughts from
@EpicNPC , the mods, and fellow sellers on this. I thought that If we’re making changes that affect the entire marketplace, it’s only fair to
let buyers have a say as well.
At the end of the day, we must abide by the platform’s rules, even if we strongly disagree. But
please reconsider this decision before finalizing it.