WARNING! Off-site contact information posted. We do not investigate disputes if you communicate off-site.
To whom it may concern,
I've received, in my opinion, a wrongful negative review on my services and methods. My reputation far exceeds the singular negative review I've been given here. All services I provide are marketed as purchasing my time spent, not the method utilized. This is made clear to all customers and is very clearly written on both my discord and my sales thread.
To the first point, the OGE is not necessarily required, but is a significant help in the process. I will concede that this is a rather valid point and could be leveraged as a 3 or 4 star review in my opinion.
To the second point, this is blatantly slander. The is no concrete proof or valid claims against this arbitrarily stated "low chance". The buyer clearly admits to have not tested this themselves and invalidates it via the text written themselves.
To the third and final point, this is a legitimate method and the user clearly doesn't want to put in the time. It seems the user was under the presumption that it was some kind of instant gratification method, which it is not. The user also attempts to leak part of the method as well in their review which further invalidates his review and honestly leaves me uncomfortable with it being publicized.
If you feel none of these points are valid, please offer me some steps to help remedy the situation. I'll gladly make some edits to my thread to help clarify things if necessary in a timely manner.
Thank you for your time and understanding,
Apex Lounge
I've received, in my opinion, a wrongful negative review on my services and methods. My reputation far exceeds the singular negative review I've been given here. All services I provide are marketed as purchasing my time spent, not the method utilized. This is made clear to all customers and is very clearly written on both my discord and my sales thread.
To the first point, the OGE is not necessarily required, but is a significant help in the process. I will concede that this is a rather valid point and could be leveraged as a 3 or 4 star review in my opinion.
To the second point, this is blatantly slander. The is no concrete proof or valid claims against this arbitrarily stated "low chance". The buyer clearly admits to have not tested this themselves and invalidates it via the text written themselves.
To the third and final point, this is a legitimate method and the user clearly doesn't want to put in the time. It seems the user was under the presumption that it was some kind of instant gratification method, which it is not. The user also attempts to leak part of the method as well in their review which further invalidates his review and honestly leaves me uncomfortable with it being publicized.
If you feel none of these points are valid, please offer me some steps to help remedy the situation. I'll gladly make some edits to my thread to help clarify things if necessary in a timely manner.
Thank you for your time and understanding,
Apex Lounge
Last edited:

