WARNING! Off-site contact information posted. Most scams occur off-site. Please contact members directly via EpicNPC chat. We do not investigate disputes if you communicate off-site.
Information
######################
Purchase Date: 22/09/2021
Date the problem begain:22/09/2021
Method of Contact Used (chat progam)
iscord
Instant Messenger username of the person you're accusing:
epicnpc account: ThesoMaxSeal
Dicord: ThesoMaxSeal#8412
Your Instant Messenger ID:
epic npc: Horiinox
Discord: Kaize#8996
Other information:
DISPUTE Information
######################
Link of transaction thread (URL, Epicnpc thread):
Approximate value of property: $116 USD (100EU)
Was Trade Guardian used?: No
If yes, what is the Trade Guardian ID?
What is the dispute about?:
Scam, he took the advertised price (which is 100 euros) and did not give me the account
Other details / notes:
Proof
######################
You MUST provide proof or your claim will not be valid!
Chat Log Screenshots (make sure username is visible, not display username):
Payment Screenshots (make sure the accused email is visible):
And the mail are in the first screen
Other proof:
######################
Purchase Date: 22/09/2021
Date the problem begain:22/09/2021
Method of Contact Used (chat progam)
Instant Messenger username of the person you're accusing:
epicnpc account: ThesoMaxSeal
Dicord: ThesoMaxSeal#8412
Your Instant Messenger ID:
epic npc: Horiinox
Discord: Kaize#8996
Other information:
DISPUTE Information
######################
Link of transaction thread (URL, Epicnpc thread):
Approximate value of property: $116 USD (100EU)
Was Trade Guardian used?: No
If yes, what is the Trade Guardian ID?
What is the dispute about?:
Scam, he took the advertised price (which is 100 euros) and did not give me the account
Other details / notes:
Proof
######################
You MUST provide proof or your claim will not be valid!
Chat Log Screenshots (make sure username is visible, not display username):
Payment Screenshots (make sure the accused email is visible):
And the mail are in the first screen
Other proof:

