Hello,
I bought an AQW account from this seller, Admi, who gave me this clearly false feedback saying, "Never transact with this scammer." However, I never scammed him and in fact, I was the buyer!
Please see the attached video for proof of the sale where I sent the money. I asked him for account information to unlock the account, and he has ignored me for months. In any case, he was not scammed, and this feedback is false.
*Staff-Only Content*
@admi please respond here
@admi please respond here
He left false feedback on my account last October 2. According to the admin, the feedback was originally submitted six months ago. However, I clearly remember seeing it appear on October 2, and I only discovered later that feedback can actually be edited.
Regarding whether I had a transaction with this person, it may have been around six months ago. However, I want to clarify the nature of these transactions. In AQW, buying, selling, and trading accounts are strictly prohibited. These transactions happen within the black market, which means they are conducted at the buyer's and seller's own risk.
Once an account gets flagged or disabled by the AQW moderators for violations involving buying, selling, or account sharing, there is very little I can do as a seller. Accounts disabled for these reasons cannot simply be recovered or unlocked through my end. This is one of the risks associated with purchasing accounts in a market where such transactions are prohibited in the first place.
What makes this situation particularly unfair is that the transaction may have actually been successful. My assumption is that the buyer initially left a five-star rating after the transaction was completed, but later edited it to one star on October 2, possibly because the account was eventually disabled.
If the transaction really happened six months ago, I also find it unreasonable that this issue is only being raised now, especially through an edited feedback that negatively affects my reputation as a seller.
I understand that buyers may have concerns regarding their purchased accounts, but sellers should not automatically be held responsible for circumstances beyond their control, particularly when the transaction involves something that is explicitly prohibited by the game's rules.
